As we all known, IBM and Oracle are close rivals in database industry for the past few years. Last year, IBM and Oracle tied for No. 1 in worldwide new license sales for relational database management systems, as the total market rose more than 10 percent to $7.8 billion, a market research firm said.
The difference in revenues between the two companies was less than $30 million, making it too close to statistically identify who is the leader of relational database market, Gartner Inc. said.
Quoted:
Based on the small amount separating the two companies, IBM had 34.1 percent of the market and Oracle 33.7 percent, or $2.665.9 billion and $2.636 billion, respectively. Microsoft was third with 20 percent, or $1.6 billion. NCR Teradata and Sybase were fourth and fifth, respectively, 2.9 percent and 2.3 percent of the market.
[Source]
Blogsphere: TechnoratiFeedsterBloglines
Bookmark: Del.icio.usSpurlFurlSimpyBlinkDigg
RSS feed for comments on this post | TrackBack URI for this post
Best Deal Ads :
Related Posts :
blog comments powered by Disqus Powered by Disqus
.................................
![SapiensBryan[a.t.]gmail[d.o.t.]com](http://www.sapiensbryan.com/wp-content/themes/adsincomewide/images/email.png "SapiensBryan[a.t.]gmail[d.o.t.]com")
Pages
Site Map
Admin
List All Posts Titles
By Month
- September 2010 (1)
- August 2010 (2)
- July 2010 (13)
- June 2010 (2)
- May 2010 (4)
- April 2010 (6)
- December 2009 (2)
- November 2009 (3)
- October 2009 (2)
- July 2009 (3)
- June 2009 (2)
- May 2009 (3)
- April 2009 (2)
- March 2009 (1)
- February 2009 (1)
- January 2009 (3)
- December 2008 (7)
- November 2008 (12)
- October 2008 (3)
- September 2008 (2)
- August 2008 (1)
- June 2008 (6)
- May 2008 (2)
- December 2007 (1)
- October 2007 (4)
- September 2007 (2)
- August 2007 (1)
- June 2007 (1)
- May 2007 (1)
- April 2007 (4)
- March 2007 (2)
- February 2007 (7)
- January 2007 (3)
- December 2006 (4)
- November 2006 (6)
- October 2006 (9)
- September 2006 (1)
- July 2006 (4)
- May 2006 (2)
- April 2006 (5)
- March 2006 (9)
- February 2006 (6)
- January 2006 (8)
- December 2005 (4)
- November 2005 (16)
- October 2005 (32)
- September 2005 (50)
- August 2005 (50)
- July 2005 (63)
- June 2005 (74)
- May 2005 (82)
- April 2005 (47)
- March 2005 (10)
Leave a Reply