<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel Lost The Dual-Core War ??</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sapiensbryan.com/index.php/intel-lost-the-dual-core-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sapiensbryan.com/index.php/intel-lost-the-dual-core-war/</link>
	<description>Get The Insight Of Hi Tech News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SapiensBryan</title>
		<link>http://www.sapiensbryan.com/index.php/intel-lost-the-dual-core-war/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>SapiensBryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 03:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sapiensbryan.com/?p=81#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Ya, you are right. Intel claims that they are better in term of floating point techologies, whereas AMD is said to be better in 3D and graphic processing.

In term of overall performance, I don&#039;t see AMD loses anyway. They make good processor and yet at an affordable price. Don&#039;t get me wrong, I &lt;b&gt;did not&lt;/b&gt; say Intel chips are bad, :p, they are definitely good in some technologies like application processing. Benchmarkings always show Intel is the winner in application processing and AMD will be  the winner in 3D and graphic.

No doubt, hands down to AMD when we talk about heat generated and power comsumption. People always think AMD has heat problem since Athlon Era, but this is definitely not the case in their new dual core &lt;b&gt;Athlon X2&lt;/b&gt;. AMD&#039;s dual core processors only consume the power of one core. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya, you are right. Intel claims that they are better in term of floating point techologies, whereas AMD is said to be better in 3D and graphic processing.</p>
<p>In term of overall performance, I don&#8217;t see AMD loses anyway. They make good processor and yet at an affordable price. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I <b>did not</b> say Intel chips are bad, :p, they are definitely good in some technologies like application processing. Benchmarkings always show Intel is the winner in application processing and AMD will be  the winner in 3D and graphic.</p>
<p>No doubt, hands down to AMD when we talk about heat generated and power comsumption. People always think AMD has heat problem since Athlon Era, but this is definitely not the case in their new dual core <b>Athlon X2</b>. AMD&#8217;s dual core processors only consume the power of one core.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LcF</title>
		<link>http://www.sapiensbryan.com/index.php/intel-lost-the-dual-core-war/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>LcF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 19:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sapiensbryan.com/?p=81#comment-32</guid>
		<description>I think Intel is better on graphic, calculation, 3D, etc and AMD is better on gaming. No? AMD is good but motherboard support is limited, huh? I am oudated on Intel vs. AMD already...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Intel is better on graphic, calculation, 3D, etc and AMD is better on gaming. No? AMD is good but motherboard support is limited, huh? I am oudated on Intel vs. AMD already&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
